Merge branch 'master' into 5.0.0

FAQ.md

@@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ See [#22](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/issues/22), [#125](https://github.c
 ##### Why Ajv does not replace references ($ref) with the actual referenced schemas as some validators do?
 
 1. The scope of Ajv is validating data against JSON-Schemas; inlining referenced schemas is not necessary for validation. When Ajv generates code for validation it either inlines the code of referenced schema or uses function calls. Doing schema manipulation is more complex and out of scope.
-2. When schemas are recursive (or mutually recursive) resolving references would result in recursive data-structures, that can be difficult to process.
+2. When schemas are recursive (or mutually recursive) resolving references would result in self-referencing recursive data-structures that can be difficult to process.
 3. There are cases when such inlining would also require adding (or modyfing) `id` attribute in the inlined schema fragment to make the resulting schema equivalent.
 
-There were many conversations about the meaning of `$ref` in [JSON-Schema GitHub organisation](https://github.com/json-schema-org). The consesus is that while it is possible to treat `$ref` as schema inclusion with two caveats (above), this interpretation is unnecessary complex. A more efficient approach is to treat `$ref` as delegation, i.e. a special keyword that validates the current data instance against the referenced schema. The analogy with programming languages is be that `$ref` is a function call rather than a macro. See [here](https://github.com/json-schema-org/json-schema-spec/issues/279), for example.
+There were many conversations about the meaning of `$ref` in [JSON-Schema GitHub organisation](https://github.com/json-schema-org). The consesus is that while it is possible to treat `$ref` as schema inclusion with two caveats (above), this interpretation is unnecessary complex. A more efficient approach is to treat `$ref` as a delegation, i.e. a special keyword that validates the current data instance against the referenced schema. The analogy with programming languages is that `$ref` is a function call rather than a macro. See [here](https://github.com/json-schema-org/json-schema-spec/issues/279), for example.
 
 
 ##### How can I generate a schema where `$ref` keywords are replaced with referenced schemas?

README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+<img align="right" alt="Ajv logo" width="160" src="http://epoberezkin.github.io/ajv/images/ajv_logo.png">
+
 # Ajv: Another JSON Schema Validator
 
 The fastest JSON Schema validator for node.js and browser with draft 6 support.
@@ -11,9 +13,9 @@ The fastest JSON Schema validator for node.js and browser with draft 6 support.
 [![Gitter](https://img.shields.io/gitter/room/ajv-validator/ajv.svg)](https://gitter.im/ajv-validator/ajv)
 
 
-__Please note__: You can start using NEW beta version [5.0.4](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.4-beta.1) (see [migration guide from 4.x.x](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.1-beta.0)) with the support of JSON-Schema draft-06 (not officially published yet): `npm install ajv@^5.0.4-beta`.
+__Please note__: You can start using NEW beta version [5.0.4](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.4-beta.3) (see [migration guide from 4.x.x](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.1-beta.0)) with the support of JSON-Schema draft-06 (not officially published yet): `npm install ajv@^5.0.4-beta`.
 
-Also see [docs](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/tree/5.0.4-beta.1) for 5.0.4.
+Also see [docs](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/tree/5.0.4-beta.3) for 5.0.4.
 
 
 ## Contents
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ Currently Ajv is the only validator that passes all the tests from [JSON Schema
 npm install ajv
 ```
 
-To install a stable beta version [5.0.4](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.4-beta.1) (see [migration guide from 4.x.x](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.1-beta.0)):
+To install a stable beta version [5.0.4](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.4-beta.3) (see [migration guide from 4.x.x](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/releases/tag/5.0.1-beta.0)):
 
 ```
 npm install ajv@^5.0.4-beta
@@ -612,7 +614,7 @@ If the option were `"failing"` then property `additional1` would have been remov
 
 __Please note__: If you use `removeAdditional` option with `additionalProperties` keyword inside `anyOf`/`oneOf` keywords your validation can fail with this schema, for example:
 
-```JSON
+```json
 {
   "type": "object",
   "oneOf": [
@@ -640,7 +642,7 @@ With the option `removeAdditional: true` the validation will pass for the object
 
 While this behaviour is unexpected (issues [#129](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/issues/129), [#134](https://github.com/epoberezkin/ajv/issues/134)), it is correct. To have the expected behaviour (both objects are allowed and additional properties are removed) the schema has to be refactored in this way:
 
-```JSON
+```json
 {
   "type": "object",
   "properties": {

scripts/travis-gh-pages

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 set -e
 
 if [[ "$TRAVIS_BRANCH" == "master" && "$TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST" == "false" && $TRAVIS_JOB_NUMBER =~ ".3" ]]; then
-  git diff --name-only $TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE | grep -qE '\.md$|^LICENSE$' && {
+  git diff --name-only $TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE | grep -qE '\.md$|^LICENSE$|travis-gh-pages$' && {
     rm -rf ../gh-pages
     git clone -b gh-pages --single-branch https://${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/epoberezkin/ajv.git ../gh-pages
     mkdir -p ../gh-pages/_source
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ if [[ "$TRAVIS_BRANCH" == "master" && "$TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST" == "false" && $TRAV
     currentDir=$(pwd)
     cd ../gh-pages
     $currentDir/node_modules/.bin/gh-pages-generator
+    # remove logo from README
+    sed -i -E "s/<img[^>]+ajv_logo[^>]+>//" index.md
     git config user.email "$GIT_USER_EMAIL"
     git config user.name "$GIT_USER_NAME"
     git add .