prettier/tests/ternaries/parenthesis.js

debug ? this.state.isVisible ? "partially visible" : "hidden" : null;
debug ? this.state.isVisible && somethingComplex ? "partially visible" : "hidden" : null;

a => a ? () => {a} : () => {a}
a => a ? a : a
a => a ? aasdasdasdasdasdasdaaasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdaaaaaa : a
Add parenthesis for unusual nested ternaries (#1386) All of the discussions around ternaries are for the form ```js cond1 ? elem1_if : cond2 ? elem2_if : elem_else ``` but some of them are for the form ```js cond1 ? cond2 ? elem2_if : elem2_else : elem1_else ``` which is more rare and would be good to call out by adding parenthesis. ```js cond1 ? (cond2 ? elem2_if : elem2_else) : elem1_else ``` Note that we only want parenthesis if it's written inline, otherwise the indentation is good enough to understand the flow: ```js cond1 ? cond2 ? elem2_if : elem2_else : elem1_else ``` 2017-05-02 00:28:36 +03:00			`debug ? this.state.isVisible ? "partially visible" : "hidden" : null;`
			`debug ? this.state.isVisible && somethingComplex ? "partially visible" : "hidden" : null;`
Only add parenthesis on ternaries inside of arrow functions if doesn't break (#1450) This was added in order to follow some eslint rule but it's only confusing when it doesn't break, when it breaks the indentation makes it clear what is happening and you don't need parenthesis. Fixes #1379 2017-05-02 00:32:52 +03:00
			`a => a ? () => {a} : () => {a}`
			`a => a ? a : a`
			`a => a ? aasdasdasdasdasdasdaaasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdaaaaaa : a`