Fix documentation: BLOCK_FLAG_TRAVERSE should be BLOCK_FLAG_DEPTH_TRAVERSE

Addresses Debian Bug #351268

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
bitmap-optimize
Theodore Ts'o 2006-03-18 08:26:36 -05:00
parent cbb7f9c4f1
commit 7447921dff
4 changed files with 15 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2006-03-18 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
* libext2fs.texinfo (Iterating over blocks in an inode): Fix
BLOCK_FLAG_TRAVERSE so it is the correct
BLOCK_FLAG_DEPTH_TRAVERSE. (Addresses Debian Bug #351268)
2006-06-30 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
* Release of E2fsprogs 1.38

View File

@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ blocks where the block number is zero (also known as ``holes''.) It is
also known as BLOCK_FLAG_APPEND, since it is also used by functions
such as ext2fs_expand_dir() to add a new block to an inode.
@item BLOCK_FLAG_TRAVERSE
@item BLOCK_FLAG_DEPTH_TRAVERSE
This flag indicates that the iterator function for the
indirect, doubly indirect, etc. blocks should be called after all
of the blocks containined in the indirect blocks are processed.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2006-03-18 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
* ext2fs.h: Fix documentation so that BLOCK_FLAG_TRAVERSE is
BLOCK_FLAG_DEPTH_TRAVERSE. (Addresses Debian Bug #351268)
2006-03-17 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
* initialize.c (calc_reserved_gdt_blocks): Fix a signed vs

View File

@ -269,9 +269,9 @@ struct struct_ext2_filsys {
* to an inode. It can also be used for programs that want to be able
* to deal with files that contain "holes".
*
* BLOCK_FLAG_TRAVERSE indicates that the iterator function for the
* indirect, doubly indirect, etc. blocks should be called after all
* of the blocks containined in the indirect blocks are processed.
* BLOCK_FLAG_DEPTH_TRAVERSE indicates that the iterator function for
* the indirect, doubly indirect, etc. blocks should be called after
* all of the blocks containined in the indirect blocks are processed.
* This is useful if you are going to be deallocating blocks from an
* inode.
*