The profile must be freed early if the subsequent memory allocation
fails for 'expanded_filename'.
Coverity ID: 14: Resource Leak
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
It is possible that e2fsck_get_dir_info() returns a NULL pointer.
We do not want to blow up when dereferencing p. It seems to be
more sane/safe to call fix_problem(ctx, PR_3_NO_DIRINFO, pctx)
if p is NULL at this point since we do not have any DIRINFO
for pctx->ino.
Also fix another (already existing) error check for
e2fsck_get_dir_info() later in the function so that it reports the
correct inode number if the dirinfo information is not found for
p->parent.
(Both of these are "should-never-happen" internal e2fsck errors that
would indicate a programming bug of some kind.)
Coverity ID: 10: Null Returns
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The dict_lookup() function can potentially return a NULL dnode_t. It is
not checked in two places in the clone_file() function. Looks to be
safe to continue if n is NULL, so just print a warning message and
continue.
Coverity ID: 9: Null Returns
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Found 2 of the three places where a return code for ext2fs_write_inode() was
not being checked.
The second fix in e2fsck/emptydir.c is basically just to shut coverity up even
though it really is unnecessary.
Coverity ID: 1: Checked Return
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Change all of the e2fsprogs programs to use the newer add_error_table()
and remove_error_table() interfaces instead of the much older
initialize_*_error_table() function.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The e2fsprogs and kernel implementation of directory hash tree has a
bug which causes the implementation to be dependent on whether
characters are signed or unsigned. Platforms such as the PowerPC,
Arm, and S/390 have signed characters by default, which means that
hash directories on those systems are incompatible with hash
directories on other systems, such as the x86.
To fix this we add a new flags field to the superblock, and define two
new bits in that field to indicate whether or not the directory should
be signed or unsigned. If the bits are not set, e2fsck and fixed
kernels will set them to the signed/unsigned value of the currently
running platform, and then respect those bits when calculating the
directory hash. This allows compatibility with current filesystems,
as well as allowing cross-architectural compatibility.
Addresses Debian Bug: #389772
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
- EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HUGE_FILE (0x0008) - change i_blocks to be
in units of s_blocksize units instead of 512-byte sectors, use
l_i_frag and l_i_fsize as i_blocks_hi (could also be part of 64BIT).
E2fsck and debugfs changed to support i_blocks_hi instead of l_i_frag and
l_i_fsize.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Badblocks now interprets last_block argument as the last block to check,
instead of the number of blocks to check, to be consistent with the
badblocks man page.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Don't core dump if there is a corrupt htree interior node. If the block
number is larger than the number of blocks in the directory, don't write
past the end of malloc'ed memory.
Addresses SourceForge Bug: #1512778
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Create new ext2fs library inline functions in order to calculate
the starting and ending blocks in a block group.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
There were still some %d's lurking when we print blocks & inodes; also
many of the counters in the e2fsck_struct were signed, and probably
need to be unsigned to avoid overflows.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
For loops iterating over all group descriptors, consistently define
first_block and last_block in a way that they are inclusive of the
range, and do not overflow.
Previously on the last block group we did a test of <= first +
dec_blocks; this would actually wrap back to 0 for a total block count
of 2^32-1
Also add handling of last block group which may be smaller.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
For loops such as:
for (i=1; i <= fs->super->s_blocks_count; i++) {
<do_stuff>
}
if i is an int and s_blocks_count is (2^32-1), the condition is never false.
Change these loops to:
for (i=1; i <= fs->super->s_blocks_count && i > 0; i++) {
<do_stuff>
}
to stop the loop when we overflow i
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This fixes some (but not all) of the compatibility bugs which prevented
e2fsprogs from being compiled on a Linux 2.0.35 system. There are still
some unprotected use of long long's, and apparently some type problems
with the uuid library, but these can be fixed up later.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Add missing brelse() calls to avoid memory leaks in error paths. (Thanks
to Michael C. Thompson for pointing these out; they were originally
found using Coverity.)
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The exlcusive device safety check that was added inadvertently broke
e2fsck -cc and mke2fs -cc since e2fsck and mke2fs hold the device
in exclusive access when badblocks is run. So we add a private option
to badblocks, -X, which is passed by e2fsck and mke2fs to badblocks
to indicate that it is OK to skip the EXT2_MF_BUSY checks.
Addresses Debian Bug: #366017
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This feature is initially intended for testing purposes; it allows an
ext2/ext3 developer to create very large filesystems using sparse files
where most of the block groups are not initialized and so do not require
much disk space. Eventually it could be used as a way of speeding up
mke2fs and e2fsck for large filesystem, but that would be best done by
adding an RO_COMPAT extension to the filesystem to allow the inode table
to be lazily initialized on a per-block basis, instead of being entirely initialized
or entirely unused on a per-blockgroup basis.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Integrate profile_std_line() into parse_line(), and profile_parse_file()
into profile_update_file() to make the code use less memory.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Change the format string(%d, %ld) for a block number and inode number
to %u or %lu.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Thanks to Andreas Dilger for this idea. If the filesystem is not mounted,
e2fsck will open it in exclusive mode to prevent the a confused/careless
system administrator from mounting the filesystem while the filesystem
check is taking place, which could cause all sorts of problems.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Check to see if the superblock hint for the external journal needs to
be updated, and if so, offer to update it. (Addresses Debian Bug:
#355644)
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
(This was an artifact of the migration of the sources from BitKeeper
to Mercurial; mea culpa, mea maximum culpa --- Ted)
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Whether fs checks are skipped when the system is running on battery can be
controlled by the new e2fsck.conf option defer_check_on_battery (this option
defaults to TRUE).
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:53:33PM -0600, Fredrick Knieper wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.31-1
>
> When running fsck at boot or when running e2fsck manually on a device,
> fsck will not check a filesystem based on the maximum mount count,
> unless a flag such as -f or -c is used to force the filesystem check.
What's happening is that when you run on battery, e2fsck will delay
running the filesystem check, on the assumption that it is better to
defer the check until some time in the future when your laptop is
running on AC mains again. This deferral is not infinite, however; if
the number of mounts exceeds twice the max mount counts, or if the
interval between checks exceeds twice the check interval, e2fsck will
force the check even though you are on battery.
I've changed the sources to print a message to make this more clear.
Addresses Debian Bug: #350306
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This also changes syntax accepted by the profile parser. The value of
profile relations must not contain spaces unless it is quoted;
otherwise the parser will throw an error. Previously something like
this was allowed:
[liboptions]
test = foo bar
Now, the relation must be in double quotes in order to be valid, i.e.,
"foo bar".
Comments are allowed anywhere and can be started with either a ';' or
a '#' character. The only place where comments will not be intepreted
as beginning a comment is in a quoted string.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Brian Behlendorf