ext2fs_extent_delete() will also update the parent node and decrement
the inode block count.
Passing in the EXT2_EXTENT_DELETE_KEEP_EMPTY flag will allow the empty
node to remain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Allows unmapping or remapping single mapped logical blocks,
and mapping currently unmapped blocks.
Also implements ext2fs_extent_fix_parents() to fix parent
index logical starts, if the first index of a node changes
its logical start block.
Currently this can result in unnecessary new single-block extents; I
think perhaps ext2fs_extent_insert should grow a flag to request
merging with a nearby extent?
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If ext2fs_extent_insert finds that the requested node
for insertion is full, it will currently fail.
With this patch it will split as necessary to make room, unless an
EXT2_EXTENT_INSERT_NOSPLIT flag is passed to it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When called for a given handle, the new function extent_node_split()
will split the current node such that half of the node's entries will
be moved to a new tree block. The parent will then be updated to
point to the (now smaller) original node as well as the new node.
If the root node is requested to be split, it will move all
entries out to a new node, and leave a single entry in the
root pointing to that new node.
If the reqested split node's parent is full it will recursively
split up to the root to make room for the new node's insertion.
If you ask to split a non-root node with only one entry,
it will refuse (we'd have an empty node otherwise).
It also updates the i_blocks count when a new block has
successfully been connected to the tree.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If the inode's i_block[] array is completely empty, create an empty
extent tree in the in-core inode and set the EXT4_EXTENT_FL inode
flag. This makes it easy to create a new inode using extents.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The logic for stopping at the right level in extent_goto was wrong,
so if you asked it to go to any level other than 0 (the leaf
level) it would fail.
Also add this argument to the tst_extents goto command to test it.
(I thought this was a failure in my split code but it was this
helper that was causing problems...)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Make sure that extent_goto() leaves us at the last extent
prior to the requested logical block, if the logical block
requested lands in a hole.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext2fs_extent_insert() only did a memmove if path->left
was > 0, but if we are at the last extent in the node,
path->left == 0, and this node must be moved before the
current extent is replaced with the newly inserted node.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The ext2fs_extent_get() function was not OR-ing together UNINIT
and LEAF flags in the case where an extent was both; so if we
had an extent which was both uniint and leaf, pass1 would bail
out where depth == max_depth but was not marked as leaf, and
e2fsck (from the next branch) would abort with:
e2fsck 1.40.8 (13-Mar-2008)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Error1: No 'down' extent
Aborted
Also, if the error is encountered again, print the inode number
to aid debugging until it's properly handled, at least.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext2fs_extent_insert() was copying n-1 of the existing extents when
moving things down to make room for the new extent.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When deleting the last entry in a node, back up the current pointer so
it is always pointing at a valid entry.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>