Summary:
This change ports ScreenEdges to operate on AbstractClient instead of
Client. For this AbstractClient gained a new pure virtual method
showOnScreenEdge which is also implemented in ShellClient.
In ShellClient the functionality is bound for the case windows can
cover a panel. If triggered the panel gets raised again.
The auto hiding panel, though, is not yet implemented. For that the
protocol needs to be adjusted to give a hint to the compositor when to
hide and hint back to the panel when it was shown. This needs a change
in KWayland and thus is not 5.8 material.
Test Plan: See added test case
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma_on_wayland
Subscribers: plasma-devel, kwin
Tags: #plasma_on_wayland, #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2793
Summary:
This change adds support for resizing outside the window decoration
(e.g. setting borders to NoSide or None).
To support this a new Toplevel::inputGeometry() -> QRect method is
added which exposes the geometry adjusted by the margins provided by
the decoration. This is checked in InputRedirection when finding a
Toplevel at a given position. The logic for figuring out whether the
event should go to the decoration or the window already handled the
situation correctly, so no further changes are needed.
BUG: 364607
FIXED-IN: 5.8.1
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma_on_wayland
Subscribers: plasma-devel, kwin
Tags: #plasma_on_wayland, #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2787
The properties:
* maximizable
* moveable
* moveableAcrossScreens
* resizeable
Were only defined on Client instead of AbstractClient. This resulted
in the EffectWindow having those properties evaluate always to false
for a ShellClient and breaking some effects.
BUG: 355947
Summary:
This allows Client to use the Wayland-specific implementation if there
is no icon geometry set through the X11 way. That way Xwayland windows
have an icon geometry even if Plasma is using Wayland and setting the
icon geometry in the Wayland way. Which is expected as Plasma is
ignorant about the windowing system a PlasmaWindow uses.
In order to move the code from ShellClient to AbstractClient
WaylandServer gained a new findAbstractClient(Surface*) method which
is just like findClient(Surface*) with the difference that it returns
an AbstractClient instead of a ShellClient*.
Test Plan:
minimized/unminimized an X client on Wayland, verified
animation is correct (though broken in general for minimize)
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma_on_wayland
Subscribers: plasma-devel, kwin
Tags: #plasma_on_wayland, #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2530
Summary:
So far when a ShellClient got unmapped ready_for_painting was set to
false. That is the ShellClient was treated in the same way as a not
yet shown window. It was completely excluded from painting, a close
animation impossible.
This change makes use of the functionality available in
Client::hiddenInternal(). The window is considered as hidden, thus
still excluded from e.g. getting input events, but could be rendered
any time as we still have a previous window pixmap (if referenced).
This allows to have it considered in the rendering pass, but effects
still cannot make use of it as that state is not yet exposed to the
effects.
Reviewers: #kwin, #plasma_on_wayland
Subscribers: plasma-devel, kwin
Tags: #plasma_on_wayland, #kwin
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2083
Summary:
Mouse actions like wheel and double click were restricted to the titleBar
area. This made the top most pixel non-interactive as it's not part of the
titleBarArea.
This change makes the complete titlebarPosition interactive. That is it
includes for a "normal" (top) setup also the TopLeft/Top/Right section.
Thus the top most pixel can be double clicked, mouse wheeled, etc.
For the Wayland case the test case is adjusted.
BUG: 362860
FIXED-IN: 5.7.0
Reviewers: #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Projects: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1596
General handling for mouse driven focus and auto raise should and can
be shared between Client and ShellClient. Thus the code is moved to
AbstractClient and invoked from Client::enterNotifyEvent.
If a ShellClient supports the ServerSideDecoration interface we can
create a server decoration for it. For that updateDecoration is added
as a pure virtual method in AbstractClient and a more-or-less code copy
from Client is added to ShellClient.
Geometry handling is adjusted to consider the window decoration offsets.
Replacement for calls to info->input() which is only valid for the Client
sub class, but not for ShellClient.
In ShellClient the implementation is swapped with wantsInput() and
wantsInput() has a new implementation which properly delegates to rules()
just like Client does.
This includes the methods:
* decoration()
* decoration() const
* isDecorated() const
In addition new protected methods are added to destroy the Decoration
and to set it.
Usage of m_decoration in Client code is adjusted.
make the minimize effect work by reading taskGeometry
from plasmawindowmanagement and returning as iconGeometry()
there is one task geometry per panel window, iconGeometry()
will return the geometry associated to the nearest panel
from the window
REVIEW:125873
Properly handle the mouse press/release events in InputRedirection
while we move windows. If it's the last mouse release event we end
the move resize of the window. For that we reuse the code written
in Client.
Methods are no longer virtual. The only x11 specific usage in these
methods (resizeInc) is replaced by a virtual method. Default resize
increments is QSize(1,1) for AbstractClient.
Method no longer virtual and only implemented in AbstractClient.
The implementaton works in a generic way nowadyas.
Added an autotest for the basic packTo behavior for packing against
a screen border. Packing towards other clients still needs adjustments
in the Placement code.
Sync related code is split out into dedicated virtual methods so that
Client can provide the X11 specific implementation. General handling,
though is completely in AbstractClient.
Implementation is moved to abstract_client.cpp as so far events.cpp
does not have any code from AbstractClient.
This includes moving the electricMaximizingDelay from Client to
AbstractClient.
The implementation of positionGeometryTip is X specific, we need to
figure out whether that one makes sense for Wayland. Given that, let's
have it virtual to ease the transition of code which calls it.
The implementation calls a virtual doStartMoveResize() which allows
Client to do it's X11 specific tasks (creating moveResizeWindow, grabbing
input).
The base implementation is no longer virtual.
Includes moving the m_cursor and Qt::CursorShape cursor() method to
AbstractClient. In addition AbstractClient now emits a signal whenever
the shape changes allowing Client to react on it (update the low level
cursor) and also hopefully the Wayland Backends to react to it, so that
we have the cursor.
Implementation goes to AbstractClient, method is no longer virtual.
The X11 specific code is moved to a new virtual protected doMove
method implemented in Client.
Method added so that we can call into TabGroup::updateStates from code
in AbstractClient. Default implementation does nothing, implementation
in Client performs the actuall call.
As a first case added to Client::move in order to be able to move the
implementation to AbstractClient.
The usage was always to trigger repaints on the old and the new
visibleRect. And store the new visibleRect as the future old one.
This is now encapsulated in a dedicated method called
addRepaintDuringGeometryUpdates().
Base test verifies the quick tile positions. No maximization or direct
state changes tested yet.
Required to have Toplevel and AbstractClient exported. Otherwise we
cannot use the SignalSpy.
In Client existing method is marked as override, in ShellClient a new
override is added which delegates to requestGeometry. Existing method
is renamed to doSetGeometry and all internal calls delegat to it.
Needs better merging with the implementation of Client.
The changeMaximize method is added as a pure virtual protected method
to AbstractClient. This replaces the previous pure virtual maximize
method. Which is now directly implemented in AbstractClient (reusing
the implementation previously in Client).
At some future point we will also need it in ShellClient and it allows us
to better share geometry related implementations.
Base implementation returns 0, that is no border.
Base implementation always returns QuickTileNone. Implementation in
Client overrides. Long term solution: provide functionality directly
in AbstractClient.
Merges together the code from ShellClient and Client and removes the
starting differences. Long term it's better to have only one
implementation to prevent diversions in the implementation.
As it doesn't match exactly protected virtual methods are called
which allow more specific implementations for a certain aspect of the
layer resolving.
AbstractClient::mainClients is virtual and overriden in Client,
allMainClients has only a common implementation in AbstractClient.
In activation.cpp we still need one case where a temporary ClientList
needs to be constructed. Once transients are fully migrated that should
be removable again.
A transient ShellClient has an offset position to the parent surface.
Use this to position the ShellClient properly.
This fixes the random placement of menus.
The creation of PlasmaWindowInterface is moved from WaylandServer into
AbstractClient. This allows the sub classes to better control when to
create/destroy the Client.
For creation it's bound to becoming visible - that is Windows which are
only created but never shown are not announced at all.
For Client it's destroyed with the normal tear-down of a Client, for
ShellClient it's destroyed on unmapped (which also means a new one
will be created again in case of another mapping of the surface).
As a side effect, this works around the problem that ShellClients do not
yet get destroyed for QtWayland's menus (needs further investigation).
Prime target is to preserve the in-screen
condition of client AND window.i[1]
Atm. when the client is fully in sight
(but the window is not) - regardless of snapping
or screen change - a workspace update (screen change,
resolution change, adding/removing a strutting panel)
would allow the client to partiall escape screen bounds.
This is changed so that if the client is fully in sight,
it's kept fully in sight (but not the decoration)
If the entire window was fully in sight, it's also kept
(as is right now)
The code handles inner screen edges (if the client was in sight,
the entire window will be if we'd bleed to the other screen)
[1] I'd say that handling the client is more relevant,
but foresee more complaints if the window wasn't handled anymore ;-)
During that, i stumbled across some other issues.
- when a window centered on one screen is moved to a screen smaller
than the window, the window is shrinked to the dimensions of that
screen and now randomly touches eg. left AND right edge. When
moved back, the right and bottom edge were preferred
(to the window was "moved" into the lower right corner).
It's now kept centered.
- geom_restore was saved before keeping the window in the new
screen area (causing accidental drops on screen changes)
BUG: 330968
REVIEW: 122517
FIXED-IN: 5.4
Prime target is to preserve the in-screen condition
of client AND window.[1]
Atm. when the client is fully in sight (but the window is not) -
regardless of snapping or screen change - a workspace update
(screen change, resolution change, adding/removing a strutting
panel) would allow the client to partiall escape screen bounds.
This is changed so that if the client is fully in sight,
it's kept fully in sight (but not the decoration)
If the entire window was fully in sight, it's also kept
(as is right now)
The code handles inner screen edges (if the client was in sight,
the entire window will be if we'd bleed to the other screen)
[1] I'd say that handling the client is more relevant,
but foresee more complaints if the window wasn't handled anymore ;-)
During that, i stumbled across some other issues.
- when a window centered on one screen is moved to a screen
smaller than the window, the window is shrinked to the dimensions
of that screen and now randomly touches eg. left AND right edge.
When moved back, the right and bottom edge were preferred
(to the window was "moved" into the lower right corner).
It's now kept centered.
- geom_restore was saved before keeping the window in the new
screen area (causing accidental drops on screen changes)
BUG: 330968
REVIEW: 116029
FIXED-IN: 5.3
At the same time the functionality for the "original_skip_taskbar" is
splitted out. This removes the weird API with two boolean arguments to
the set method. Instead there is a dedicated method for the orignal
skip taskbar state which delegates to regular skipTaksbar.
* properties defined in AbstractClient
* implementation of isShade moved to AbstractClient
* implementation of setShade(bool) moved to AbstractClient
* default implementation for isShadeable added to AbstractClient
* default implementation for shadeMode returning ShadeNone
* default implementation fo setShade which does nothing
Moves the properties and the base implementation into AbstractClient.
Methods invoke a new protected virtual method which is implemented in
Client to update the TabGroup.
Moves the implmentation to AbstractClient. Methods are no longer virtual,
setActive calls a virtual protected method which is implemented in Client
for Client specific activation code.
A virtual base implementation is provided which does nothing. Needed
in AbstractClient to get Workspace::slotWindowGrow* to work with
active_client becoming an AbstractCliet.
The change is mostly straight forward. Effects are straight forward
adjusted. Client::findModal is moved up, this causes still a few
dynamic_casts to Client. Mostly because Workspace::activateClient still
operates on Client.
The idea for this base class is to provide access to all elements which
make up a managed "Client" being it X11 or Wayland. They share a lot,
like they have a caption, they can be minimized, etc. etc.
Of course it would have also been possible to derive a new class from
Client, but that looks like the more difficult task as Client is very
X11 specific.
So far only a very small interface is extracted with pure-virtual
methods. This is going to change by moving the functionality up into
the AbstractClient.
The interface extracted so far is inspired by the usage of FocusChain
and users of FocusChain.
Martin Gräßlin