Implementation goes to AbstractClient, method is no longer virtual.
The X11 specific code is moved to a new virtual protected doMove
method implemented in Client.
Method added so that we can call into TabGroup::updateStates from code
in AbstractClient. Default implementation does nothing, implementation
in Client performs the actuall call.
As a first case added to Client::move in order to be able to move the
implementation to AbstractClient.
The usage was always to trigger repaints on the old and the new
visibleRect. And store the new visibleRect as the future old one.
This is now encapsulated in a dedicated method called
addRepaintDuringGeometryUpdates().
Base test verifies the quick tile positions. No maximization or direct
state changes tested yet.
Required to have Toplevel and AbstractClient exported. Otherwise we
cannot use the SignalSpy.
In Client existing method is marked as override, in ShellClient a new
override is added which delegates to requestGeometry. Existing method
is renamed to doSetGeometry and all internal calls delegat to it.
Needs better merging with the implementation of Client.
The changeMaximize method is added as a pure virtual protected method
to AbstractClient. This replaces the previous pure virtual maximize
method. Which is now directly implemented in AbstractClient (reusing
the implementation previously in Client).
At some future point we will also need it in ShellClient and it allows us
to better share geometry related implementations.
Base implementation returns 0, that is no border.
Base implementation always returns QuickTileNone. Implementation in
Client overrides. Long term solution: provide functionality directly
in AbstractClient.
Merges together the code from ShellClient and Client and removes the
starting differences. Long term it's better to have only one
implementation to prevent diversions in the implementation.
As it doesn't match exactly protected virtual methods are called
which allow more specific implementations for a certain aspect of the
layer resolving.
AbstractClient::mainClients is virtual and overriden in Client,
allMainClients has only a common implementation in AbstractClient.
In activation.cpp we still need one case where a temporary ClientList
needs to be constructed. Once transients are fully migrated that should
be removable again.
A transient ShellClient has an offset position to the parent surface.
Use this to position the ShellClient properly.
This fixes the random placement of menus.
The creation of PlasmaWindowInterface is moved from WaylandServer into
AbstractClient. This allows the sub classes to better control when to
create/destroy the Client.
For creation it's bound to becoming visible - that is Windows which are
only created but never shown are not announced at all.
For Client it's destroyed with the normal tear-down of a Client, for
ShellClient it's destroyed on unmapped (which also means a new one
will be created again in case of another mapping of the surface).
As a side effect, this works around the problem that ShellClients do not
yet get destroyed for QtWayland's menus (needs further investigation).
Prime target is to preserve the in-screen
condition of client AND window.i[1]
Atm. when the client is fully in sight
(but the window is not) - regardless of snapping
or screen change - a workspace update (screen change,
resolution change, adding/removing a strutting panel)
would allow the client to partiall escape screen bounds.
This is changed so that if the client is fully in sight,
it's kept fully in sight (but not the decoration)
If the entire window was fully in sight, it's also kept
(as is right now)
The code handles inner screen edges (if the client was in sight,
the entire window will be if we'd bleed to the other screen)
[1] I'd say that handling the client is more relevant,
but foresee more complaints if the window wasn't handled anymore ;-)
During that, i stumbled across some other issues.
- when a window centered on one screen is moved to a screen smaller
than the window, the window is shrinked to the dimensions of that
screen and now randomly touches eg. left AND right edge. When
moved back, the right and bottom edge were preferred
(to the window was "moved" into the lower right corner).
It's now kept centered.
- geom_restore was saved before keeping the window in the new
screen area (causing accidental drops on screen changes)
BUG: 330968
REVIEW: 122517
FIXED-IN: 5.4
Prime target is to preserve the in-screen condition
of client AND window.[1]
Atm. when the client is fully in sight (but the window is not) -
regardless of snapping or screen change - a workspace update
(screen change, resolution change, adding/removing a strutting
panel) would allow the client to partiall escape screen bounds.
This is changed so that if the client is fully in sight,
it's kept fully in sight (but not the decoration)
If the entire window was fully in sight, it's also kept
(as is right now)
The code handles inner screen edges (if the client was in sight,
the entire window will be if we'd bleed to the other screen)
[1] I'd say that handling the client is more relevant,
but foresee more complaints if the window wasn't handled anymore ;-)
During that, i stumbled across some other issues.
- when a window centered on one screen is moved to a screen
smaller than the window, the window is shrinked to the dimensions
of that screen and now randomly touches eg. left AND right edge.
When moved back, the right and bottom edge were preferred
(to the window was "moved" into the lower right corner).
It's now kept centered.
- geom_restore was saved before keeping the window in the new
screen area (causing accidental drops on screen changes)
BUG: 330968
REVIEW: 116029
FIXED-IN: 5.3
At the same time the functionality for the "original_skip_taskbar" is
splitted out. This removes the weird API with two boolean arguments to
the set method. Instead there is a dedicated method for the orignal
skip taskbar state which delegates to regular skipTaksbar.
Martin Gräßlin