From c5348c6a163f6956e7f640902b7401a1b4bad8c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:21:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs/system: Add SGX documentation to the system manual Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong Message-Id: <20210719112136.57018-34-yang.zhong@intel.com> [Convert to reStructuredText, and adopt the standard === --- ~~~ headings suggested for example by Linux. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- docs/system/i386/sgx.rst | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/system/target-i386.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/system/i386/sgx.rst diff --git a/docs/system/i386/sgx.rst b/docs/system/i386/sgx.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f103ae2a2f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/system/i386/sgx.rst @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) +=============================== + +Overview +-------- + +Intel Software Guard eXtensions (SGX) is a set of instructions and mechanisms +for memory accesses in order to provide security accesses for sensitive +applications and data. SGX allows an application to use it's pariticular +address space as an *enclave*, which is a protected area provides confidentiality +and integrity even in the presence of privileged malware. Accesses to the +enclave memory area from any software not resident in the enclave are prevented, +including those from privileged software. + +Virtual SGX +----------- + +SGX feature is exposed to guest via SGX CPUID. Looking at SGX CPUID, we can +report the same CPUID info to guest as on host for most of SGX CPUID. With +reporting the same CPUID guest is able to use full capacity of SGX, and KVM +doesn't need to emulate those info. + +The guest's EPC base and size are determined by Qemu, and KVM needs Qemu to +notify such info to it before it can initialize SGX for guest. + +Virtual EPC +~~~~~~~~~~~ + +By default, Qemu does not assign EPC to a VM, i.e. fully enabling SGX in a VM +requires explicit allocation of EPC to the VM. Similar to other specialized +memory types, e.g. hugetlbfs, EPC is exposed as a memory backend. + +SGX EPC is enumerated through CPUID, i.e. EPC "devices" need to be realized +prior to realizing the vCPUs themselves, which occurs long before generic +devices are parsed and realized. This limitation means that EPC does not +require -maxmem as EPC is not treated as {cold,hot}plugged memory. + +Qemu does not artificially restrict the number of EPC sections exposed to a +guest, e.g. Qemu will happily allow you to create 64 1M EPC sections. Be aware +that some kernels may not recognize all EPC sections, e.g. the Linux SGX driver +is hardwired to support only 8 EPC sections. + +The following Qemu snippet creates two EPC sections, with 64M pre-allocated +to the VM and an additional 28M mapped but not allocated:: + + -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=64M,prealloc=on \ + -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem2,size=28M \ + -M sgx-epc.0.memdev=mem1,sgx-epc.1.memdev=mem2 + +Note: + +The size and location of the virtual EPC are far less restricted compared +to physical EPC. Because physical EPC is protected via range registers, +the size of the physical EPC must be a power of two (though software sees +a subset of the full EPC, e.g. 92M or 128M) and the EPC must be naturally +aligned. KVM SGX's virtual EPC is purely a software construct and only +requires the size and location to be page aligned. Qemu enforces the EPC +size is a multiple of 4k and will ensure the base of the EPC is 4k aligned. +To simplify the implementation, EPC is always located above 4g in the guest +physical address space. + +Migration +~~~~~~~~~ + +Qemu/KVM doesn't prevent live migrating SGX VMs, although from hardware's +perspective, SGX doesn't support live migration, since both EPC and the SGX +key hierarchy are bound to the physical platform. However live migration +can be supported in the sense if guest software stack can support recreating +enclaves when it suffers sudden lose of EPC; and if guest enclaves can detect +SGX keys being changed, and handle gracefully. For instance, when ERESUME fails +with #PF.SGX, guest software can gracefully detect it and recreate enclaves; +and when enclave fails to unseal sensitive information from outside, it can +detect such error and sensitive information can be provisioned to it again. + +CPUID +~~~~~ + +Due to its myriad dependencies, SGX is currently not listed as supported +in any of Qemu's built-in CPU configuration. To expose SGX (and SGX Launch +Control) to a guest, you must either use `-cpu host` to pass-through the +host CPU model, or explicitly enable SGX when using a built-in CPU model, +e.g. via `-cpu ,+sgx` or `-cpu ,+sgx,+sgxlc`. + +All SGX sub-features enumerated through CPUID, e.g. SGX2, MISCSELECT, +ATTRIBUTES, etc... can be restricted via CPUID flags. Be aware that enforcing +restriction of MISCSELECT, ATTRIBUTES and XFRM requires intercepting ECREATE, +i.e. may marginally reduce SGX performance in the guest. All SGX sub-features +controlled via -cpu are prefixed with "sgx", e.g.:: + + $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu help | xargs printf "%s\n" | grep sgx + sgx + sgx-debug + sgx-encls-c + sgx-enclv + sgx-exinfo + sgx-kss + sgx-mode64 + sgx-provisionkey + sgx-tokenkey + sgx1 + sgx2 + sgxlc + +The following Qemu snippet passes through the host CPU but restricts access to +the provision and EINIT token keys:: + + -cpu host,-sgx-provisionkey,-sgx-tokenkey + +SGX sub-features cannot be emulated, i.e. sub-features that are not present +in hardware cannot be forced on via '-cpu'. + +Virtualize SGX Launch Control +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Qemu SGX support for Launch Control (LC) is passive, in the sense that it +does not actively change the LC configuration. Qemu SGX provides the user +the ability to set/clear the CPUID flag (and by extension the associated +IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR bit in fw_cfg) and saves/restores the LE Hash MSRs +when getting/putting guest state, but Qemu does not add new controls to +directly modify the LC configuration. Similar to hardware behavior, locking +the LC configuration to a non-Intel value is left to guest firmware. Unlike +host bios setting for SGX launch control(LC), there is no special bios setting +for SGX guest by our design. If host is in locked mode, we can still allow +creating VM with SGX. + +Feature Control +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Qemu SGX updates the `etc/msr_feature_control` fw_cfg entry to set the SGX +(bit 18) and SGX LC (bit 17) flags based on their respective CPUID support, +i.e. existing guest firmware will automatically set SGX and SGX LC accordingly, +assuming said firmware supports fw_cfg.msr_feature_control. + +Launching a guest +----------------- + +To launch a SGX guest: + +.. parsed-literal:: + + |qemu_system_x86| \\ + -cpu host,+sgx-provisionkey \\ + -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=64M,prealloc=on \\ + -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem2,size=28M \\ + -M sgx-epc.0.memdev=mem1,sgx-epc.1.memdev=mem2 + +Utilizing SGX in the guest requires a kernel/OS with SGX support. +The support can be determined in guest by:: + + $ grep sgx /proc/cpuinfo + +and SGX epc info by:: + + $ dmesg | grep sgx + [ 1.242142] sgx: EPC section 0x180000000-0x181bfffff + [ 1.242319] sgx: EPC section 0x181c00000-0x1837fffff + +References +---------- + +- `SGX Homepage `__ + +- `SGX SDK `__ + +- SGX specification: Intel SDM Volume 3 diff --git a/docs/system/target-i386.rst b/docs/system/target-i386.rst index c9720a8cd1..6a86d63863 100644 --- a/docs/system/target-i386.rst +++ b/docs/system/target-i386.rst @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Architectural features :maxdepth: 1 i386/cpu + i386/sgx .. _pcsys_005freq: