Add fallthrough annotations to be able to compile the code without
warnings with -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Looking at the code, it seems
like the fallthrough is indeed intended here, so the comments should
be appropriate.
Message-Id: <20200630055953.9309-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Commit dc99065b5f (v0.1.0) added dis-asm.h from binutils.
Commit 43d4145a98 (v0.1.5) inlined bfd.h into dis-asm.h to remove the
dependency on binutils.
Commit 76cad71136 (v1.4.0) moved dis-asm.h to include/disas/bfd.h.
The new name is confusing when you try to match against (pre GPLv3+)
binutils. Rename it back. Keep it in the same directory, of course.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190417191805.28198-17-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Unused function declarations were found using a simple gcc plugin and
manually verified by grepping the sources.
Signed-off-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1453832250-766-28-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Warning from the Sparse static analysis tool:
disas/sh4.c:335:22: warning:
symbol 'sh_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Thomas Huth