Coverity is reporting in CID 1405304 that tpm_execute() may pass a NULL
tpm_proxy->host_path pointer to open(). This is based on the fact that
h_tpm_comm() does a NULL check on tpm_proxy->host_path and then passes
tpm_proxy to tpm_execute().
The check in h_tpm_comm() is abusive actually since a spapr-proxy-tpm
requires a non NULL host_path property, as checked during realize.
Fixes: 0fb6bd0732
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <156805260916.1779401.11054185183758185247.stgit@bahia.lan>
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This implements the H_TPM_COMM hypercall, which is used by an
Ultravisor to pass TPM commands directly to the host's TPM device, or
a TPM Resource Manager associated with the device.
This also introduces a new virtual device, spapr-tpm-proxy, which
is used to configure the host TPM path to be used to service
requests sent by H_TPM_COMM hcalls, for example:
-device spapr-tpm-proxy,id=tpmp0,host-path=/dev/tpmrm0
By default, no spapr-tpm-proxy will be created, and hcalls will return
H_FUNCTION.
The full specification for this hypercall can be found in
docs/specs/ppc-spapr-uv-hcalls.txt
Since SVM-related hcalls like H_TPM_COMM use a reserved range of
0xEF00-0xEF80, we introduce a separate hcall table here to handle
them.
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20190717205842.17827-3-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[dwg: Corrected #include for upstream change]
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Greg Kurz