The upcoming XICS-KVM support will use bits of emulated XICS code.
So this introduces new level of hierarchy - "xics-common" class. Both
emulated XICS and XICS-KVM will inherit from it and override class
callbacks when required.
The new "xics-common" class implements:
1. replaces static "nr_irqs" and "nr_servers" properties with
the dynamic ones and adds callbacks to be executed when properties
are set.
2. xics_cpu_setup() callback renamed to xics_common_cpu_setup() as
it is a common part for both XICS'es
3. xics_reset() renamed to xics_common_reset() for the same reason.
The emulated XICS changes:
1. the part of xics_realize() which creates ICPs is moved to
the "nr_servers" property callback as realize() is too late to
create/initialize devices and instance_init() is too early to create
devices as the number of child devices comes via the "nr_servers"
property.
2. added ics_initfn() which does a little part of what xics_realize() did.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The upcoming support of in-kernel XICS will redefine migration callbacks
for both ICS and ICP so classes and callback pointers are added.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Basically, in HW the layout of the interrupt network is:
- One ICP per processor thread (the "presenter"). This contains the
registers to fetch a pending interrupt (ack), EOI, and control the
processor priority.
- One ICS per logical source of interrupts (ie, one per PCI host
bridge, and a few others here or there). This contains the per-interrupt
source configuration (target processor(s), priority, mask) and the
per-interrupt internal state.
Under PAPR, there is a single "virtual" ICS ... somewhat (it's a bit
oddball what pHyp does here, arguably there are two but we can ignore
that distinction). There is no register level access. A pair of firmware
(RTAS) calls is used to configure each virtual interrupt.
So our model here is somewhat the same. We have one ICS in the emulated
XICS which arguably *is* the emulated XICS, there's no point making it a
separate "device", that would just be gross, and each VCPU has an
associated ICP.
Yet we call the "XICS" struct icp_state and then the ICPs
'struct icp_server_state'. It's particularly confusing when all of the
functions have xics_prefixes yet take *icp arguments.
Rename:
struct icp_state -> XICSState
struct icp_server_state -> ICPState
struct ics_state -> ICSState
struct ics_irq_state -> ICSIRQState
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Message-id: 1374175984-8930-12-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com
[aik: added ics_resend() on post_load]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Many of these should be cleaned up with proper qdev-/QOM-ification.
Right now there are many catch-all headers in include/hw/ARCH depending
on cpu.h, and this makes it necessary to compile these files per-target.
However, fixing this does not belong in these patches.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Alexey Kardashevskiy