In commit 3fa9642ff7 change was made to convert the RDMA backend to
accept MigrateAddress struct. However, the assignment of "host" leads
to data corruption on the target host and the failure of migration.
isock->host = rdma->host;
By allocating the memory explicitly for it with g_strdup_printf(), the
issue is fixed and the migration doesn't fail any more.
Fixes: 3fa9642ff7 ("migration: convert rdma backend to accept MigrateAddress")
Cc: qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHEcVy4L_D6tuhJ8h=xLR4WaPaprJE3nnxZAEyUnoTrxQ6CF5w@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
[peterx: use g_strdup() instead of g_strdup_printf(), per Zhijian]
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Solaris has #defines for htonll and ntohll which cause syntax errors
when compiling code that attempts to (re)define these functions..
Signed-off-by: Nick Briggs <nicholas.h.briggs@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/65a04a7d.497ab3.3e7bef1f@gateway.sonic.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
RDMA based transport backend for 'migrate'/'migrate-incoming' QAPIs
accept new wire protocol of MigrateAddress struct.
It is achived by parsing 'uri' string and storing migration parameters
required for RDMA connection into well defined InetSocketAddress struct.
Suggested-by: Aravind Retnakaran <aravind.retnakaran@nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231023182053.8711-7-farosas@suse.de>
This let us simplify code of this shape.
qemu_fflush(f);
int ret = qemu_file_get_error(f);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
into:
int ret = qemu_fflush(f);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
I updated all callers where there is any error check.
qemu_fclose() don't need to check for f->last_error because
qemu_fflush() returns it at the beggining of the function.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231025091117.6342-13-quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Now that we know it only handles zero, we can remove the ch parameter.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231019085259.13307-3-quintela@redhat.com>
We don't allow non zero compressed pages since:
commit 3edcd7e6eb
Author: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Date: Tue Mar 26 10:58:35 2013 +0100
migration: search for zero instead of dup pages
RDMA case is a bit more complicated, but they don't handle it since:
commit a1febc4950
Author: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon Aug 29 11:46:14 2016 -0700
cutils: Export only buffer_is_zero
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231019085259.13307-2-quintela@redhat.com>
Change code that is:
int ret;
...
ret = foo();
if (ret[ < 0]?) {
to:
if (foo()[ < 0]) {
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-14-quintela@redhat.com>
Declare all variables that are only used inside a for loop inside the
for statement.
This makes clear that they are not used outside of the for loop.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-13-quintela@redhat.com>
Once there, all the uses are local to the for, so declare the variable
inside the for statement.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-12-quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-11-quintela@redhat.com>
Functions are long enough even without this.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-10-quintela@redhat.com>
The only user was rdma, and its use is gone.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-8-quintela@redhat.com>
The only user of ram_control_save_page() and save_page() hook was
rdma. Just move the function to rdma.c, rename it to
rdma_control_save_page().
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-7-quintela@redhat.com>
There is only one flag called with: RAM_CONTROL_BLOCK_REG.
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-6-quintela@redhat.com>
Instead of going through ram_control_load_hook(), call
qemu_rdma_registration_handle() directly.
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-5-quintela@redhat.com>
Once there:
- Remove unused data parameter
- unfold it in its callers
- change all callers to call qemu_rdma_registration_stop()
- We need to call QIO_CHANNEL_RDMA() after we check for migrate_rdma()
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-4-quintela@redhat.com>
Once there:
- Remove unused data parameter
- unfold it in its callers.
- change all callers to call qemu_rdma_registration_start()
- We need to call QIO_CHANNEL_RDMA() after we check for migrate_rdma()
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-3-quintela@redhat.com>
Helper to say if we are doing a migration over rdma.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231011203527.9061-2-quintela@redhat.com>
qemu_rdma_dump_id() dumps RDMA device details to stdout.
rdma_start_outgoing_migration() calls it via qemu_rdma_source_init()
and qemu_rdma_resolve_host() to show source device details.
rdma_start_incoming_migration() arranges its call via
rdma_accept_incoming_migration() and qemu_rdma_accept() to show
destination device details.
Two issues:
1. rdma_start_outgoing_migration() can run in HMP context. The
information should arguably go the monitor, not stdout.
2. ibv_query_port() failure is reported as error. Its callers remain
unaware of this failure (qemu_rdma_dump_id() can't fail), so
reporting this to the user as an error is problematic.
Fixable, but the device detail dump is noise, except when
troubleshooting. Tracing is a better fit. Similar function
qemu_rdma_dump_id() was converted to tracing in commit
733252deb8 (Tracify migration/rdma.c).
Convert qemu_rdma_dump_id(), too.
While there, touch up qemu_rdma_dump_gid()'s outdated comment.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-54-armbru@redhat.com>
error_report() obeys -msg, reports the current error location if any,
and reports to the current monitor if any. Reporting to stderr
directly with fprintf() or perror() is wrong, because it loses all
this.
Fix the offenders. Bonus: resolves a FIXME about problematic use of
errno.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-53-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_source_init(), qemu_rdma_connect(),
rdma_start_incoming_migration(), and rdma_start_outgoing_migration()
violate this principle: they call error_report() via
qemu_rdma_cleanup().
Moreover, qemu_rdma_cleanup() can't fail. It is called on error
paths, and QIOChannel close and finalization. Are the conditions it
reports really errors? I doubt it.
Downgrade qemu_rdma_cleanup()'s errors to warnings.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-52-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_write_one() violates this principle: it reports errors to
stderr via qemu_rdma_register_and_get_keys(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up: silence qemu_rdma_register_and_get_keys(). I believe
the caller's error reports suffice. If they don't, we need to convert
to Error instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-51-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_post_send_control(), qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response(), and
qemu_rdma_write_one() violate this principle: they call
error_report(), fprintf(stderr, ...), and perror() via
qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid(), qemu_rdma_poll(), and
qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel(). I elected not to investigate how
callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not known.
Clean this up by dropping the error reporting from qemu_rdma_poll(),
qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel(), and qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid(). I
believe the callers' error reports suffice. If they don't, we need to
convert to Error instead.
Bonus: resolves a FIXME about problematic use of errno.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-50-armbru@redhat.com>
When qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel() receives an event from the
completion channel, it reports an error "receive cm event while wait
comp channel,cm event is T", where T is the numeric event type.
However, the function fails only when T is a disconnect or device
removal. Events other than these two are not actually an error, and
reporting them as an error is wrong. If we need to report them to the
user, we should use something else, and what to use depends on why we
need to report them to the user.
For now, report this error only when the function actually fails.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-49-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_source_init() and qemu_rdma_accept() violate this principle:
they call error_report() via qemu_rdma_reg_control(). I elected not
to investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is
not known.
Clean this up by dropping the error reporting from
qemu_rdma_reg_control(). I believe the callers' error reports
suffice. If they don't, we need to convert to Error instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-48-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_connect() violates this principle: it calls error_report()
and perror(). I elected not to investigate how callers handle the
error, i.e. precise impact is not known.
Clean this up: replace perror() by changing error_setg() to
error_setg_errno(), and drop error_report(). I believe the callers'
error reports suffice then. If they don't, we need to convert to
Error instead.
Bonus: resolves a FIXME about problematic use of errno.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-47-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_resolve_host() violates this principle: it calls
error_report().
Clean this up: drop error_report().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-46-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_source_init() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_alloc_pd_cq(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_alloc_pd_cq() to Error.
The conversion loses a piece of advice on one of two failure paths:
Your mlock() limits may be too low. Please check $ ulimit -a # and search for 'ulimit -l' in the output
Not worth retaining.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-45-armbru@redhat.com>
Just for symmetry with qemu_rdma_post_send_control(). Error messages
lose detail I consider of no use to users.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-44-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_exchange_send() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_post_send_control(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_post_send_control() to Error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-43-armbru@redhat.com>
Just for consistency with qemu_rdma_write_one() and
qemu_rdma_write_flush(), and for slightly simpler code.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-42-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_write_flush() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_write_one(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_write_one() to Error. Bonus:
resolves a FIXME about problematic use of errno.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-41-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qio_channel_rdma_writev() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_write_flush(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_write_flush() to Error.
Necessitates setting an error when qemu_rdma_write_one() failed.
Since this error will go away later in this series, simply use "FIXME
temporary error message" there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-40-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_exchange_send() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via callback qemu_rdma_reg_whole_ram_blocks(). I
elected not to investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise
impact is not known.
Clean this up by converting the callback to Error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-39-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qemu_rdma_exchange_send() and qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() violate this
principle: they call error_report() via
qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response(). I elected not to investigate how
callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() to
Error.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-38-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qio_channel_rdma_writev() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_exchange_send(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_exchange_send() to Error.
Necessitates setting an error when qemu_rdma_post_recv_control(),
callback(), or qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() failed. Since these
errors will go away later in this series, simply use "FIXME temporary
error message" there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-37-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
qio_channel_rdma_readv() violates this principle: it calls
error_report() via qemu_rdma_exchange_recv(). I elected not to
investigate how callers handle the error, i.e. precise impact is not
known.
Clean this up by converting qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() to Error.
Necessitates setting an error when qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response()
failed. Since this error will go away later in this series, simply
use "FIXME temporary error message" there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-36-armbru@redhat.com>
These guards are all redundant now.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-35-armbru@redhat.com>
qemu_rdma_resolve_host() and qemu_rdma_dest_init() iterate over
addresses to find one that works, holding onto the first Error from
qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() for use when no address works. Issues:
1. If @errp was &error_abort or &error_fatal, we'd terminate instead
of trying the next address. Can't actually happen, since no caller
passes these arguments.
2. When @errp is a pointer to a variable containing NULL, and
qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() fails, the variable no longer
contains NULL. Subsequent iterations pass it again, violating
Error usage rules. Dangerous, as setting an error would then trip
error_setv()'s assertion. Works only because
qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() and the code following the loops
carefully avoids setting a second error.
3. If qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() fails, and then a later iteration
finds a working address, @errp still holds the first error from
qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel(). If we then run into another error,
we report the qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() failure instead.
4. If we don't run into another error, we leak the Error object.
Use a local error variable, and propagate to @errp. This fixes 3. and
also cleans up 1 and partly 2.
Free this error when we have a working address. This fixes 4.
Pass the local error variable to qemu_rdma_broken_ipv6_kernel() only
until it fails. Pass null on any later iterations. This cleans up
the remainder of 2.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-34-armbru@redhat.com>
ERROR() has become "error_setg() unless an error has been set
already". Hiding the conditional in the macro is in the way of
further work. Replace the macro uses by their expansion, and delete
the macro.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-33-armbru@redhat.com>
Functions that use an Error **errp parameter to return errors should
not also report them to the user, because reporting is the caller's
job. When the caller does, the error is reported twice. When it
doesn't (because it recovered from the error), there is no error to
report, i.e. the report is bogus.
Macro ERROR() violates this principle. Delete the error_report()
there.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-32-armbru@redhat.com>
When migration capability @rdma-pin-all is true, but the server cannot
honor it, qemu_rdma_connect() calls macro ERROR(), then returns
success.
ERROR() sets an error. Since qemu_rdma_connect() returns success, its
caller rdma_start_outgoing_migration() duly assumes @errp is still
clear. The Error object leaks.
ERROR() additionally reports the situation to the user as an error:
RDMA ERROR: Server cannot support pinning all memory. Will register memory dynamically.
Is this an error or not? It actually isn't; we disable @rdma-pin-all
and carry on. "Correcting" the user's configuration decisions that
way feels problematic, but that's a topic for another day.
Replace ERROR() by warn_report(). This plugs the memory leak, and
emits a clearer message to the user.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-31-armbru@redhat.com>
When a function returns 0 on success, negative value on error,
checking for non-zero suffices, but checking for negative is clearer.
So do that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-30-armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-29-armbru@redhat.com>
All we do with the value of RDMAContext member @error_state is test
whether it's zero. Change to bool and rename to @errored.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-28-armbru@redhat.com>
This is just to make the error value more obvious. Callers don't
mind.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-27-armbru@redhat.com>
Several functions return negative errno codes on failure. Callers
check for specific codes exactly never. For some of the functions,
callers couldn't check even if they wanted to, because the functions
also return negative values that aren't errno codes, leaving readers
confused on what the function actually returns.
Clean up and simplify: return -1 instead of negative errno code.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-26-armbru@redhat.com>
rdma_getaddrinfo() returns 0 on success. On error, it returns one of
the EAI_ error codes like getaddrinfo() does, or -1 with errno set.
This is broken by design: POSIX implicitly specifies the EAI_ error
codes to be non-zero, no more. They could clash with -1. Nothing we
can do about this design flaw.
Both callers of rdma_getaddrinfo() only recognize negative values as
error. Works only because systems elect to make the EAI_ error codes
negative.
Best not to rely on that: change the callers to treat any non-zero
value as failure. Also change them to return -1 instead of the value
received from getaddrinfo() on failure, to avoid positive error
values.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230928132019.2544702-25-armbru@redhat.com>
Yu Zhang