Commit Graph

6 Commits (9468484fe904ab4691de6d9c34616667f377ceac)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stefan Hajnoczi a4a411fbaf Replace "iothread lock" with "BQL" in comments
The term "iothread lock" is obsolete. The APIs use Big QEMU Lock (BQL)
in their names. Update the code comments to use "BQL" instead of
"iothread lock".

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-5-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-08 10:45:43 -05:00
Alexander Graf 4b870dc4d0 hostmem-file: add offset option
Add an option for hostmem-file to start the memory object at an offset
into the target file. This is useful if multiple memory objects reside
inside the same target file, such as a device node.

In particular, it's useful to map guest memory directly into /dev/mem
for experimentation.

To make this work consistently, also fix up all places in QEMU that
expect fd offsets to be 0.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20230403221421.60877-1-graf@amazon.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
2023-05-23 16:47:03 +02:00
Peter Xu cedb70eafb migration: Use non-atomic ops for clear log bitmap
Since we already have bitmap_mutex to protect either the dirty bitmap or
the clear log bitmap, we don't need atomic operations to set/clear/test on
the clear log bitmap.  Switching all ops from atomic to non-atomic
versions, meanwhile touch up the comments to show which lock is in charge.

Introduced non-atomic version of bitmap_test_and_clear_atomic(), mostly the
same as the atomic version but simplified a few places, e.g. dropped the
"old_bits" variable, and also the explicit memory barriers.

Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
2022-11-21 11:58:10 +01:00
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 40d7ca33b9 exec/ramblock: Add missing includes
"exec/ramblock.h" requires "qemu/rcu.h" for the definition of
rcu_head, and "exec/ramlist.h" for the definition of RAMBlockNotifier.
Add them to avoid when when refactoring include/:

  include/exec/ramblock.h:26:21: error: field has incomplete type 'struct rcu_head'
    struct rcu_head rcu;
                    ^

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220207082756.82600-6-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
2022-02-21 10:18:06 +01:00
David Hildenbrand 898ba906cc migration/ram: Handle RAM block resizes during postcopy
Resizing while migrating is dangerous and does not work as expected.
The whole migration code works with the usable_length of a ram block and
does not expect this value to change at random points in time.

In the case of postcopy, relying on used_length is racy as soon as the
guest is running. Also, when used_length changes we might leave the
uffd handler registered for some memory regions, reject valid pages
when migrating and fail when sending the recv bitmap to the source.

Resizing can be trigger *after* (but not during) a reset in
ACPI code by the guest
- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c:acpi_ram_update()
- hw/i386/acpi-build.c:acpi_ram_update()

Let's remember the original used_length in a separate variable and
use it in relevant postcopy code. Make sure to update it when we resize
during precopy, when synchronizing the RAM block sizes with the source.

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210429112708.12291-9-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
2021-05-13 18:21:14 +01:00
Juan Quintela 41aa4e9fd8 ram_addr: Split RAMBlock definition
We need some of the fields without having to poison everything else.

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
2020-01-29 11:28:59 +01:00