The logic was already working, it was just special-cased to the first comment of the file! Presumably because the new line detection logic used to be broken ;)
I manually checked the first 10 snapshots and they are all legit, so I assume that all of them are.
Fixes#356
We don't call the generic print on the BinaryExpression itself, so we need to manually print those comments. It's going to be useful for my work on the MemberExpression :)
It's actually not needed to use conditionalGroup as we can use ifBreak for it. I was able to do it just for cleanup and found out that it also fixed two of the bugs we have with comments. That's great :p
Fixes#485Fixes#486
Conditionals are very common in JSX and it is unfortunate that they take up so much vertical space in the current prettier.
This pull request does a few tweaks:
- It hugs ConditionalExpression (ternary) and LogicalExpression (&&) inside of `{}` in a jsx child, not an attribute
- It doesn't output parenthesis if your parent is a LogicalExpression (&&)
Fixes#317
Mobx is the only popular JavaScript library that I know about which uses decorators. They put things on the same line so we should follow their conventions.
The logic implemented here is the following: if there is one decorator, it's on the same line. If there is more than one, they are each on their own line.
Fixes#325
This was introduced by #314 where `line` should have been `softline`. By the way, I was going to propose renaming `line` to `line_or_space` and `softline` to `line_or_nothing` which should make it more explicit what is going on.
Fixes#461
* new_tests
* move_all_clobbered_tests
* remove all the tests that no longer exist
* re-run flow tests
* Move all the flow tests to tests/flow and prettier to tests/
* Move prettier tests to their own folders
* Add jsfmt files
* run prettier snapshot tests
Given the discussion on #296, it seems like there's debate between spaces around `{}` but no one puts spaces around `[]`. So changing the behavior to respect this.
The original intent of it was for `if then else` and `try catch` as they aren't likely to be empty, but it accidentally caught function bodys, which have many valid reasons to be empty. Let's special case those out.
This one is really weird
```js
if (() => {} ? 1 : 0) {}
```
parses fine but
```js
if (() => {
} ? 1 : 0) {}
```
is a syntax error. Let's always add a parenthesis.
Note that no one is every going to write this in practice, this is really useless :p
We actually need this `;` for EmptyStatement, otherwise it applies to the next block of code. (Creating a label with an empty statement is completely useless, but it triggers a lot in the fuzz testing tool)
Fixes#376
Christopher Chedeau