prettier

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Brian Ng	2283efb437	Fix parens around ternary inside OptionalMemberExpression (#5179 )	2018-10-02 20:45:15 -05:00
Simen Bekkhus	51b7c02e12	Upgrade jest to 22 (#4782 ) * chore: upgrade Jest * chore: update snapshots * chore: lock down babel dependency using invalid syntax * 2 args to test.skip * use jest 22 for now * Revert "2 args to test.skip" This reverts commit 691fdc3f99e320f2303958f2b503f7b4c93fa455. * remove snapshot name from matcher * fix standalone tests skips	2018-07-03 03:06:29 -03:00
Lucas Duailibe	c2202efd54	Do not remove parens for ?. operator (#4542 )	2018-05-24 23:27:49 -03:00
Christopher Chedeau	7819a8f010	[flow] Upgrade flow to 0.69 and enable ?. support (#4296 ) Flow now support ?. so this PR enables it in prettier	2018-04-10 18:03:34 -07:00
Lucas Duailibe	f119d4a90f	Change run_spec to have explicit parser list (#3356 )	2017-11-30 03:31:52 -03:00
Lucas Azzola	264ec70999	Don't use parens with optional chaining meber expressions (#2921 )	2017-09-28 17:46:47 +10:00
Lucas Azzola	e378f5e9ba	Implement proposal-optional-chaining (#2572 ) * Implement proposal-optional-chaining Closes #2568 * Refactor optional token printing	2017-08-03 17:38:02 +10:00