* Extract custom tests from tests/flow/
Approach:
1. Remove all .js files in tests/flow except .snap.js files.
2. Copy over all .js files from tests/ in the flow repo.
3. Go through the diff looking for deletions.
- It was easy to see which deletions were due to changes in the tests
due to updates in the flow repo.
- For the rest of the deletions, I used `git blame` to verify that
they had been added by us since the flow tests were copied over.
This makes tests/flow/ simply a copy of the tests from the flow repo,
making it easier to sync with the upstream flow tests in the future.
* Add a script for syncing the flow tests
* Sync the flow tests
* Revert "Remove mutation in `printBinaryishExpressions` (#1067)"
This reverts commit e7312ad7b2.
* Revert "Make it clear what parser was used in each snapshot (#1068)"
This reverts commit 4f7ae4815b.
There is an off by one error which made the algorithm not work all the time. In many cases, it actually is the opposite, so whenever you save, it adds/removes that line. I noticed it during the --debug-check run on our codebase but didn't investigate.
Fixes#723
The original motivation for this change is trying to fix#560 where the comment was attached to the JSXText node instead of the JSXExpressionContainer because it used the globalPrecedingNode. In general, I don't think that it is very safe to attach a comment to a random node just because it happened to be before.
I tried to delete the globalPrecedingNode codepath and I think that it actually improves the results. I'll add inline comments in the pull request to explain the various changes.
Fixes#560
It turns that our hasNextLine logic needs to be tuned to skip all the trailing comments. The code is not pretty but it does the job. It looks like it fixes a bunch of things in the test cases :)
I made sure that nested inline comments are NOT valid JavaScript
```js
/* /* a */ */
Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token *
```
so it is okay to do a dumb search for */ when you are in a comment
It turns out that the range is not inclusive. It incorrectly included a \n after and would expand way more objects than we intended to.
I found it while running prettier on the codebase.
I'll make 0.14.1 for this.
Another attempt at solving the issue where objects are not expanded the way people expect. If there's any new line in the original source, it's going to expand it. This gives more control to the user in how the objects should be formatted.
Fixes#74
The logic was already working, it was just special-cased to the first comment of the file! Presumably because the new line detection logic used to be broken ;)
I manually checked the first 10 snapshots and they are all legit, so I assume that all of them are.
Fixes#356
* new_tests
* move_all_clobbered_tests
* remove all the tests that no longer exist
* re-run flow tests
* Move all the flow tests to tests/flow and prettier to tests/
* Move prettier tests to their own folders
* Add jsfmt files
* run prettier snapshot tests
Lucas Duailibe