pve-qemu/debian/patches/extra/0004-ide-avoid-potential-deadlock-when-draining-during-tr.patch

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:03:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ide: avoid potential deadlock when draining during trim
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The deadlock can happen as follows:
1. ide_issue_trim is called, and increments the in_flight counter.
2. ide_issue_trim_cb calls blk_aio_pdiscard.
3. Somebody else starts draining (e.g. backup to insert the cbw node).
4. ide_issue_trim_cb is called as the completion callback for
   blk_aio_pdiscard.
5. ide_issue_trim_cb issues yet another blk_aio_pdiscard request.
6. The request is added to the wait queue via blk_wait_while_drained,
   because draining has been started.
7. Nobody ever decrements the in_flight counter and draining can't
   finish. This would be done by ide_trim_bh_cb, which is called after
   ide_issue_trim_cb has issued its last request, but
   ide_issue_trim_cb is not called anymore, because it's the
   completion callback of blk_aio_pdiscard, which waits on draining.

Quoting Hanna Czenczek:
> The point of 7e5cdb345f was that we need any in-flight count to
> accompany a set s->bus->dma->aiocb. While blk_aio_pdiscard() is
> happening, we don’t necessarily need another count. But we do need
> it while there is no blk_aio_pdiscard().
> ide_issue_trim_cb() returns in two cases (and, recursively through
> its callers, leaves s->bus->dma->aiocb set):
> 1. After calling blk_aio_pdiscard(), which will keep an in-flight
>    count,
> 2. After calling replay_bh_schedule_event() (i.e.
>    qemu_bh_schedule()), which does not keep an in-flight count.

Thus, even after moving the blk_inc_in_flight to above the
replay_bh_schedule_event call, the invariant "ide_issue_trim_cb
returns with an accompanying in-flight count" is still satisfied.

However, the issue 7e5cdb345f fixed for canceling resurfaces, because
ide_cancel_dma_sync assumes that it just needs to drain once. But now
the in_flight count is not consistently > 0 during the trim operation.
So, change it to drain until !s->bus->dma->aiocb, which means that the
operation finished (s->bus->dma->aiocb is cleared by ide_set_inactive
via the ide_dma_cb when the end of the transfer is reached).

Discussion here:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-03/msg02506.html

Fixes: 7e5cdb345f ("ide: Increment BB in-flight counter for TRIM BH")
Suggested-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
 hw/ide/core.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index 45d14a25e9..08e1f0c3d7 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static void ide_trim_bh_cb(void *opaque)
     iocb->bh = NULL;
     qemu_aio_unref(iocb);
 
-    /* Paired with an increment in ide_issue_trim() */
+    /* Paired with an increment in ide_issue_trim_cb() */
     blk_dec_in_flight(blk);
 }
 
@@ -504,6 +504,8 @@ static void ide_issue_trim_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
 done:
     iocb->aiocb = NULL;
     if (iocb->bh) {
+        /* Paired with a decrement in ide_trim_bh_cb() */
+        blk_inc_in_flight(s->blk);
         replay_bh_schedule_event(iocb->bh);
     }
 }
@@ -515,9 +517,6 @@ BlockAIOCB *ide_issue_trim(
     IDEState *s = opaque;
     TrimAIOCB *iocb;
 
-    /* Paired with a decrement in ide_trim_bh_cb() */
-    blk_inc_in_flight(s->blk);
-
     iocb = blk_aio_get(&trim_aiocb_info, s->blk, cb, cb_opaque);
     iocb->s = s;
     iocb->bh = qemu_bh_new(ide_trim_bh_cb, iocb);
@@ -740,8 +739,9 @@ void ide_cancel_dma_sync(IDEState *s)
      */
     if (s->bus->dma->aiocb) {
         trace_ide_cancel_dma_sync_remaining();
-        blk_drain(s->blk);
-        assert(s->bus->dma->aiocb == NULL);
+        while (s->bus->dma->aiocb) {
+            blk_drain(s->blk);
+        }
     }
 }