* Implement new logic for wrapping binary op in arrowFunctionExpression.
* Add new test cases.
* Reuse new helper function in order to fix#917.
* Add new test case.
* Extend heuristic to dive deeper into mixed types.
* Add new test.
* Enhance logic to cover more cases.
* Add new test cases.
* Disable Flow as it gets BindExpression as an unexpected token.
* Simplify getCombinedDeepest function.
* Add missing case.
* Extract all conditions in switch cases to one top level condition.
* Refactor implementation to make it cleaner and also handle ExpressionStatement.
* Update related test cases.
* Add new test case.
* Make condition less expensive.
* Clean up unecessary conditions, simplify condition involving startsWithOpenCurlyBrace.
* Update and add new test cases for better coverage.
* Remove unecessary condition, refactor canBeFirstInStatement to drop some useless parens.
* Update test cases accordingly 🚀.
* Add new handleOnlyComments function.
* Update tests.
* Update test as the printer forces a trailing newline if there were any contents.
* Implement a different heuristic.
* Update tests.
* Add directives checking in handleOnlyComments function.
* Add directives checking in handleOnlyComments function (amend to retrigger CI).
* Remove duplicate.
* Add new helper function to convert comments as blocks in ExportNamedDeclaration.
* Add new test.
* Switch to a leading position.
* Update test accordingly.
The comments infra has been architected with trailing operators and fails for leading `|`. Instead of having leading comments, we can put trailing comments on the previous one and use the same technique as assignment to deal with the indentation.
Fixes#849
This happens very frequently that naming a test makes the entire line go > 80 columns and requires to indent everything which takes a lot more space. We've had this being reported multiple times and it also affects a lot of tests inside of fb.
Fixes#159
(Note, this is built on-top of #841 but github doesn't handle stacked pull requests well...)
This is a leftover from the recast prototype, it hasn't been touched since then. I have never seen anyone not put the label on the same line.
Fixes#859
This is a neat trick from the React codebase. It helps highlight the fact that this is an assignment and not a comparison which is subtle to realize.
Fixes#861
In #605 I restricted it to binary operations as I didn't know how it would affect boolean operations but it turns out the same technique solves problems that people are reporting. So doesn't make sense to restrict it.
Fixes#824
It turns out that my fix was not correct. We should not add parenthesis for FunctionDeclaration instead of checking if the function expression is named.
Fixes#819
In #596, I fixed a bunch of jsx expression comment edge cases and happened to add a softline there. But it turns out that it's not needed and is actually harmful :)
Fixes#712
Since this is extremely rare, I just took the easy way out and if you are adding a comment inside the "as" node, I just move it outside. We could be more fancy but that works.
Fixes#620
This has come up a couple times on the issue tracker on the react-native-web discussion about Twitter internals. It seems like there's a concensus that people don't break long require calls and they'd rather have it go > 80 columns.
Fixes#303Fixes#752
I'm not really sure what a general rule is for those, but starting with LogicalExpressions should be good. Outside of identifiers, function calls and logical expressions, there aren't a lot of things you'd put there in real code anyway.
Fixes#822
Instead of trying to figure out a complicated way to preserve their correct position, it's easier to just migrate those comments before the class.
Fixes#693Fixes#694
Printing a merged group indented was actually not the right fix. The right fix was to print them in a single line. It used to have this behavior when I was mutating the first group but now that I don't anymore I need to reproduce this condition.
Fixes#823
We need to add parenthesis around function expressions if they are named otherwise the name leak, but if the function is not named then it's just superfluous.
The conditional change is due to a bad use of switch case where it would fall through the next one. We don't want parenthesis there.
Kevin Gibbons