This file was never getting compiled, and there is no user of
ext2fs_list_backups() in the e2fsprogs sources. So remove it as a
clean up.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This tests creates a file system where the last entry in one leaf
block overlaps with logical block range in the first entry of the next
leaf block.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
e2fsck does not detect extents which are outside their location in the
extent tree. This can result in a bad extent at the end of an extent-block
not being detected.
From a part of a dump_extents output:
1/ 2 37/ 68 143960 - 146679 123826181 2720
2/ 2 1/ 2 143960 - 146679 123785816 - 123788535 2720
2/ 2 2/ 2 146680 - 147583 123788536 - 123789439 904 Uninit <-bad extent
1/ 2 38/ 68 146680 - 149391 123826182 2712
2/ 2 1/ 2 146680 - 147583 18486 - 19389 904
2/ 2 2/ 2 147584 - 149391 123789440 - 123791247 1808
e2fsck does not detect this bad extent which both overlaps another, valid
extent, and is invalid by being beyond the end of the extent above it in
the tree.
This patch modifies e2fsck to detect this invalid extent and remove it.
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Perhaps the most serious fix up is a type-punning warning which could
result in miscompilation with overly enthusiastic compilers.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
... or indeed by any mainline kernel, since the compression patches
were never stablized.
Addresses-Debian-Bug: #707609
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: "Creidieki M. Crouch" <creidieki@gmail.com>
When opening the external journal, use the same logic to decide
whether or not to open the file system with EXT2_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE found
in main().
Otherwise, it's not posible to use e2fsck when the root file system is
using an external journal.
Reported-by: Calvin Owens <jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
E2fsck previously was complaining with zero-length extended attributes
if they appeared in the in-inode xattr space. Test to make sure
e2fsck is now happy with such xattrs.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
e2fsck thinks that this:
# touch mnt/testfile1
# setfattr -n "user.test" mnt/testfile1
results in a filesystem with corruption:
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Extended attribute in inode 12 has a value size (0) which is invalid
Clear? yes
but as far as I can tell, there is absolutely nothing wrong with
a 0-length value on an extended attribute. Just remove the check.
Reported-by: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Reported-by: Harald Reindl <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Addresses-Red-Hat-Bugzilla: #557959
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The ext2fs_read_inode_full() function should not use fs->read_inode()
if the caller has requested more than the base 128 byte inode
structure and the inode size is greater than 128 bytes. Otherwise the
caller won't get all of the bytes that they were asking for, since
there's no way for the fs->read_inode override function can know what
the size of the buffer passed to ext2fs_read_inode_full().
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This prevents from SIGSEGV when -s options is used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
All data cannot be included in normal image file so e2image should exit
in this case.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Exit is called right after the install_image anyway so this one can
be removed.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Disallow tune2fs command to set the inode size to be larger than the
block size. Without this patch, tune2fs makes the file system to be
unmountable.
Steps to reproduce:
1.Create ext4 without flex_bg (or just create ext3)
# mke2fs -t ext4 -O ^flex_bg DEV
2.Set inode size larger than block size
# tune2fs -I 8192 DEV
3. We failed to mount FS
# mount DEV MP
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda7,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
Signed-off-by: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The only checksum program which we can reliably count upon being
installed on all systems is "sum", which is not a particular robust
checksum. The problem with using md5sum or sha1sum is it hat it may
not be installed on all systems. So create a crcsum program which is
used so we can validate that a data file on a resized file system has
not been corrupted.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When doing an off-line resize2fs of an initially very small file
system, it's possible to run out of reserved gdt blocks (which are
reserved via the resize inode). Once we run out, we need to move the
allocation bitmaps and inode table out of the way to grow the gdt
blocks. Unfortunately, when moving these metadata blocks, it was
possible that a block that had been just been newly allocated for a
new block group could also get allocated for a metadata block for an
existing block group that was being moved.
To prevent this, after we grow the gdt blocks and allocate the
metadata blocks for the new block groups, make sure all of these
blocks are marked as reserved.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: John Jolly <john.jolly@gmail.com>
The extent_inode commands split_node, replace_node, and insert_node
take arguments which resulted in confusing error messages after
succeeding. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Commit e3507739e4 introduced a build failure if e2fsprogs is
configured with --enable-jbd-debug. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
New function ext2fs_symlink() doesn't have a prototype in ext2fs.h and
thus debugfs compilation gives warning:
debugfs.c:2219:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ext2fs_symlink'
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parse_num_blocks2() wrongly did:
num << 1;
when log_block_size < 0. That is obviously wrong as such statement has
no effect (and the compiler properly warns about it). Callers expect
returned value to be in bytes when log_block_size < 0 so fix the
statement accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In order to support kernels which support conversion of extent-mapped
files to direct/indirect mapped files, remove the sanity check which
prevented clearing the extent flag in chattr. Kernels which don't
support this will simply give an Operation Not Supported error.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In the tables which are used to parse the fields for the set_fields
command, there should never be a entry which has a size set to 8
bytes, and two pointers defined. Not only would it result in
undefined behavior in the compiled code, it doesn't make any sense and
is definitely a bug.
Reported-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
ext2fs_llseek() was using lseek instead of lseek64. The
only time it would use lseek64 is if passed an offset that
overflowed 32 bits. This works for SEEK_SET, but not
SEEK_CUR, which can apply a small offset to move the file
pointer past the 32 bit limit.
The code has been changed to instead try lseek64 first, and
fall back to lseek if that fails. It also was doing a
runtime check of the size of off_t. This has been moved to
compile time.
This fixes a problem which would cause e2image when built for
x86-32 to bomb out when used with large file systems.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Declare the internal symbols alloc_dirstruct() and cache_dirstruct()
as static so they don't leak out into the global namespace.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This is part of a series of improvements from a 2008 version of
spd_readdir.c that somehow didn't make it into the version which we
checked into e2fsprogs git tree.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This is part of a series of improvements from a 2008 version of
spd_readdir.c that somehow didn't make it into the version which we
checked into e2fsprogs git tree.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Fixes resize2fs so it correctly calculates the number of free clusters
in each block group for file systems with the bigalloc feature
enabled.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The ext2fs_{mark,unmark,test}_block_bitmap2() functions understand
about clusters, and will take block numbers and convert them to
clusters before checking the bitmap. The
ext2fs_*_block_bitmap_range2() functions did not do this, which made
them inconsistent. Fortunately, nothing has depended on this
incorrect behavior, and in fact most of the usage of these functions
have only recently been added, and only for optimizations that were
only enabled for non-bigalloc file systems.
So this is a change in previously exported functions, but (a) it
doesn't change the behavior at all for non-bigalloc file systems, and
(b) the change is more likely to fix bugs for bigalloc file systems.
For example, this change fixes a problem with resize2fs and bigalloc
file systems.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This should be made into a more formal, automated test case, but for
now, save this as script since it's useful for validating resize2fs's
handling of very large file systems.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Theodore Ts'o